Kargil Vijay Diwas, observed annually on 26th July, commemorates India’s decisive victory in the 1999 Kargil War. This day is not merely a remembrance of the sacrifices made during Operation Vijay but serves as a crucial marker in India’s broader strategic evolution. Since its partition in 1947, India has faced persistent and multifaceted hostility from Pakistan, particularly concerning the region of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).
'
In this context, the 1999 Kargil War represents not just a tactical military victory but a pivotal doctrinal shift. It was the first televised, limited conventional war under nuclear overhang in South Asia, and it exposed both strengths and vulnerabilities in India’s defense establishment. More significantly, it catalyzed an irreversible transformation in India’s strategic thinking, a shift that would ultimately culminate in the assertive, technology-driven Operation Si
India's Enduring Struggle Against Pakistan's Proxy War
India's struggle against Pakistan's proxy war is a protracted one, reflecting Pakistan's continuous conspiracy against India since 1947. This enduring conflict is essentially a battle between Indian nationalism and Pakistan-backed separatism and terrorism. Since 1947, India has been a victim of Pakistan-sponsored separatism, terrorism, and warfare, having defeated Pakistan in four conventional wars, yet Pakistan's efforts persist through direct conflict or proxy warfare/terrorism, involving targeted killings, massacres, and attacks on military and police forces.
Pakistan has consistently fueled separatism and terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir since 1947. In response, nationalist citizens in J&K have continuously sacrificed their lives to preserve India's integrity. Kargil Vijay Diwas serves as a poignant reminder of these sacrifices and India's resilience, symbolizing a pledge to triumph in this unceasing struggle.
Here is a chronological account of India's enduring struggle:
1947: The Pakistani Invasion of Jammu & Kashmir
Hindu and Sikh civilians who had survived from areas like Mirpur, Bagh, and Palandri were forcibly captured and crammed into the Kirtan Garh Gurdwara near Mirpur (later known as the “Ali Beg Camp”).
This gurdwara, instead of being a place of worship, turned into a center of inhumane torture and death for thousands of prisoners.
Pakistani raiders and tribal invaders locked men, women, and children in overcrowded conditions without food, water, or medical aid. Due to the harsh winter, suffocating crowding, and complete lack of humanitarian provisions, thousands fell severely ill.
According to survivors, prisoners were picked out daily and either brutally killed or tortured. Even children were not spared.
Based on various eyewitness accounts, Red Cross reports, and historical documents, over 7,000–8,000 Hindu and Sikh detainees were mercilessly massacred in Ali Beg Camp.
The massacre also involved the abduction of women and girls, religious humiliation (including forced cutting of hair, forced conversions), and killings.
Months later, when Red Cross representatives finally arrived, only a few thousand sick, injured, and mentally shattered individuals were found alive. Almost all others had either been killed or were untraceable.
The Ali Beg Camp incident was the most horrific chapter of the 1947 Mirpur Massacre, sending a clear message that this Pakistan sponsored assault was an act of religious cleansing and a systematic crime against humanity.
What happened at Ali Beg Camp stands as one of the most gruesome massacres in history, marked by calculated murder, humiliation, and the peak of inhumanity in the name of religious identity.
To this day, the incident remains a painful symbol of injustice and suffering for thousands of displaced families from Kashmir.
1. UNCIP is Formed and Pakistan Initially Denies Military Presence
In January 1948, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 47, which created the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) to mediate the Kashmir dispute. The commission visited the subcontinent in mid‑1948 to assess the situation on ground & negotiate a cease‑fire agreement
When UNCIP arrived in Pakistan, Islamabad asserted that its regular army was not deployed in Kashmir, it claimed only tribal irregulars (“tribesmen”) were involved in the conflict
2. UNCIP Observes the Reality: Pakistani Troop Presence
Despite Pakistan’s denial, UNCIP conducted on‑site inspections and gathered intelligence. By August 1948, UNCIP reported to the UN Security Council that the “presence of troops of Pakistan” in Kashmir constituted a “material change” in the situation.
3. Pakistan Admits Deploying Two Infantry Battalions
Following mounting pressure and visibility of troop movements, Pakistan was forced to acknowledge the facts: it reluctantly admitted that at least two infantry battalions of its regular army were operating inside Kashmir—directly contradicting its initial denial
4. UNCIP’s Anger and Declaration of Aggression
UNCIP’s members were incensed by Pakistan’s duplicity and non‑cooperation. In the official UNCIP report to the Security Council, the Commission explicitly declared Pakistan as the Aggressor, noting that Pakistan had launched an unjustified armed attack on a sovereign state by using its regular army disguised as tribesmen.
Total area under illegal Pakistani occupation: 86,268 sq km
1. Pakistan Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (POJK)
2. Pakistan Occupied Territories of Ladakh (POTL),
1965 Indo-Pakistan War: Pakistan launched "Operation Gibraltar" in August 1965, infiltrating thousands into J&K, followed by attacks in Punjab and Rajasthan. India mounted a strong counteroffensive, capturing 1,800 sq km of Pakistani territory before a UN ceasefire on September 22-23. Casualties were heavy on both sides, with around 3,000 Indians and 3,800 Pakistanis killed.
Valor of Indian Army at Patton Tank Battle (Battle of Asal Uttar):
During the 1965 Indo-Pak war, the Battle of Asal Uttar (September 8-10) showcased extraordinary valor and strategy by Indian soldiers facing Pakistan's technologically superior M47 and M48 American Patton tanks. Despite India's outdated tank fleet including Sherman, AMX-13, and limited Centurion tanks, Indian troops laid a brilliant trap by flooding the sugarcane fields near Khem Karan, turning the terrain into a swamp. This tactic immobilized many of the heavily armored Pattons, neutralizing their advantage in speed and firepower.
Indian forces formed a strong horseshoe-shaped defensecamouf
A standout hero was Havildar Abdul Hamid, who displayed remarkable courage by destroying multiple Patton tanks with a recoilless rifle while driving a jeep through the flooded fields. His actions significantly inflicted losses on the Pakistani armored units and earned him the Param Vir Chakra, India's highest military honor.
This battle decisively turned the tide in India's favor, showcasing not only Indian soldiers' bravery but also their tactical ingenuity in overcoming a better-equipped enemy.
1971 India-Pakistan War-
1980s-1990s: Pakistan's Proxy War and Islamist Terrorism
-In 1992, when Pakistan-backed terrorism was spreading across the Kashmir valley, terrorists also entered the tough and hilly areas of Kishtwar and Doda.
1995: Village Defence Committees (VDC) – Civilian Resistance to Terrorism
1999: Kargil War – Pervez Musharraf's Conspiracy, India's Response
2000-2015: Era of Terrorist Attacks and Massacres
After the Kargil defeat, Pakistan realizes it cannot win conventional wars and focuses on infiltration and proxy warfare after 2000. Terrorist attacks are no longer confined to J&K but spread nationwide.
This was the first major attack on the Sikh community in Kashmir since the Paki sponsored Islamic terrorism began in 1989. The massacre occurred just days before U.S. President Bill Clinton’s official visit to India, raising international attention on Kashmir. The Chattisinghporamassacre remains one of the darkest and most controversial chapters in the history of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir.
Targeted Attacks on Security Forces and Institutions
Parliament Attack (2001): Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists attacked India’s Parliament in Delhi, aiming to cause mass casualties and chaos. Nine security personnel were martyred, but the terrorists were prevented from entering the building.
J&K Assembly Attack (2001): A suicide bomber rammed an explosives-laden car into the Assembly complex, followed by gunfire. Thirty-eight people were killed in this attempt to disrupt democratic institutions.
Udhampur and Gurdaspur Attacks (2015): Pakistani terrorists targeted BSF vehicles and police stations in border areas. In Gurdaspur, a police station was under siege for several hours, showing that the threat had spread beyond Jammu and Kashmir.
Urban Serial Bombings
Mumbai (2003): Twin blasts at Gateway of India and Zaveri Bazaar killed 52 people, striking the heart of India’s financial capital.
Delhi (2005): Just 2 days before Diwali, bombings in Sarojini Nagar, Paharganj, and Govindpuri killed 62 people during the festive shopping rush.
Mumbai Local Train Blasts (2006): 7 coordinated bomb blasts on July 11 killed 209 people and injured over 700, targeting Mumbai’s suburban railway system.
Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Delhi (2008): Serial bombings across these three cities killed more than 150 people. Indian Mujahideen, with links to Pakistan, claimed responsibility.
Communal and Pilgrim Attacks
Pahalgam (2000): 21 Hindu pilgrims were killed in a targeted attack.
Srinagar and Anantnag (2001–2002): More than 35 pilgrims were killed during the Amarnath Yatra in separate attacks.
Anantnag (2017): 8 Amarnath Yatra pilgrims were killed and 18 injured when their bus was attacked by Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists.
Raghunath Mandir Attacks (2002): The temple was attacked twice in the same year, resulting in the deaths of over 25 pilgrims. Religious sites were deliberately targeted to incite fear and division.
2015-2019: New Era of Hybrid Terrorism
Pahalgam Attack and Operation Sindoor
Operation Vijay vs Operation Sindoor
From Strategic Restraint to Strategic Dominance
Recalling Operation Vijay (1999): A doctrinal snapshot
Operation Vijay, launched in May 1999, was India’s tactical and strategic response to
Pakistan’s intrusion in the Kargil-Dras sector. It was:
• Reactive, triggered only after enemy occupation.
• Fought under international scrutiny, with India consciously choosing not to cross the LoC.
• Executed with heroic ground-level courage but limited high-tech support (satellite intel was minimal; UAVs were rare).
Key characteristics:
• Doctrine: “Holding Ground” + “Limited Counterattack”
• Posture: Defensive, Border-Centric
• Objective: Restore status quo
• Constraints: Avoid escalation due to nuclear overhang
Despite these constraints, Operation Vijay restored all occupied positions, but did not impose long-term deterrence on Pakistan. Within a year, Pakistan returned to asymmetric warfare.
Strategic gaps post Ops Vijay: Why India needed a doctrinal reset
After Kargil, India realized:
• Conventional superiority was not enough.
• A reactive posture meant India always absorbed the first blow.
• Pakistan's nuclear cover emboldened it to launch low-cost hybrid wars.
This led to:
• Early drafts of Cold Start Doctrine (2004 onwards).
• Emphasis on swift, localized, conventional retaliation under a nuclear threshold.
• But until 2016, the doctrine remained undeclared and unused.
India’s deterrence credibility was still questioned until a series of assertive actions reset the narrative.
Enter Operation Sindoor (2025): A New Era of Dominance Doctrine
Operation Sindoor, conducted on 7 May 2025, represents a pivotal strategic shift in India's military history and its approach to managing cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. This operation marked a definitive departure from India's traditionally reactive stance to a proactive and dominant posture, signaling that it would impose tangible and escalating costs for the pursuit of terrorism as a state policy.
Trigger and Immediate Response
Operation Sindoor was launched in direct retaliation to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, on 22 April 2025, which tragically killed 26 civilians, targeted on religious grounds. This attack was incited by a provocative speech from Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir, seen as a direct incitement to terrorists. India's response was swift and decisive, involving precise missile strikes on terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and POJK. For the first time, this included targeting the headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) at Muridke and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) at Bahawalpur, deep within Pakistan's mainland. This operation was the culmination of weeks of meticulous planning and detailed intelligence gathering.